Mynd Healthcare

Health sciences / Make

Make

The work of making health knowledge clear, checkable and reusable.

  1. Preparing a health-research manuscriptA useful manuscript lets readers see the question, what was done, what was found and how far the findings can travel. Preparing it well means reporting enough detail for the work to be assessed, not making the conclusions sound stronger.Read guide
  2. Peer review: what the process can and cannot showPeer review is a critical reading of a manuscript, not a guarantee that every finding is true. This is an educational guide to review practices, not an operating Mynd journal policy.Read guide
  3. Corrections and retractions: reading the publication recordA paper can change after publication. Read the notice, the affected article and the latest version together to understand what changed and what can still be relied on. A label alone does not explain the reason.Read guide
  4. Preparing a diagnostic-accuracy study reportA diagnostic-accuracy report should show which clinical question was asked, who was tested, how the comparison was made and what the estimates leave uncertain. Clear reporting enables assessment; it does not certify a test or prove patient benefit.Read guide
  5. Research consent: understanding a choice before making itInformed consent is a conversation about a specific study, not only a signed form. Information, understanding and voluntary choice need attention before participation and as the research continues.Read guide

What exists today

Publishing-practice guides are available now. The Mynd Healthcare Journal remains planned: no journal issue, peer-review board or submission service is claimed.