Mynd Healthcare

Make / research integrity

Corrections and retractions: reading the publication record

A paper can change after publication. Read the notice, the affected article and the latest version together to understand what changed and what can still be relied on. A label alone does not explain the reason.

A correction identifies a change

ICMJE distinguishes errors of fact from matters of debate or evolving science. A correction should describe the change and cite the original article. Readers need to know whether a detail, analysis or interpretation changed and whether the conclusion still holds. Not every disagreement with a paper is an error, and a correction is not automatically a retraction. Inspect the specific notice rather than guessing the importance from its title.

A retraction is a warning about reliance

COPE describes retraction as a way to correct the literature and alert readers when findings and conclusions cannot be relied on. Unreliable work can result from honest error or misconduct; a retraction alone does not establish which occurred. The notice should identify the article and explain why it was retracted. Read that explanation before attributing blame or repeating the original finding as dependable evidence.

An expression of concern leaves a question open

An expression of concern can alert readers when reliability is in question but the available information does not yet support a final decision. COPE and ICMJE describe its use while concerns or investigations remain unresolved. COPE notes that it can be an interim notice or a final outcome when the issue cannot be resolved. It is not a correction of a specified result, and it is not a finding of misconduct. Check whether a later notice or investigation outcome has changed the record; an old warning may not describe the current state.

Read the version as well as the notice

ICMJE recommends a new article version that describes and dates its changes, retention of prior versions, and a prominent indication on earlier versions that a newer one exists. Serious errors may require retraction; in some honest-error cases, retraction and republication can allow a corrected paper to be assessed again. A downloaded PDF can predate these changes. Check the publisher record and cite the appropriate current version, with the notice when it matters to the claim.

A database link is a route to the evidence

PubMed links eligible correction, retraction and expression-of-concern notices to affected citations. NLM uses article types and related-citation links to distinguish a notice from the original article. These links help find the publication record, but do not replace reading it. NLM also describes how notices must be reported and identified for linking. The absence of a visible link should not be treated as a guarantee that no issue exists.

Keep the conclusion within the record

Ask what was changed, why, how much of the article is affected, and whether there is a newer notice. A correction may preserve a conclusion or change its interpretation; a retraction can have different stated causes. Keep these distinctions visible when summarizing health research. This page is general publishing education, not a live corrections index, an investigation service or an adopted policy of a functioning Mynd journal.

Source note

This is general health-science education. No clinical review has been performed.

General publishing education, not a live index, misconduct verdict, investigation service or adopted Mynd journal policy.

Evidence

Read next