Home / Collaboration & Implementation Literacy
For Prospective Collaborators
Evaluating a possible healthcare collaboration starts with a clear problem, appropriate evidence and explicit responsibilities.
#Start with a need, not a proposed product
WHO's digital implementation guide describes needs-based investment aligned with health programmes, national architecture and country readiness. AHRQ's workflow toolkit connects technology planning with both clinical and administrative work. These sources start from a health-system purpose rather than a product's appeal.
Describe the care problem, the people affected and the setting before proposing a tool. This page offers questions for reading a possible project, not an invitation to an available Mynd programme. WHO's guide concerns country-level digital planning and AHRQ's toolkit concerns ambulatory health IT; neither is a universal collaboration contract.
Evidence: WHO (2020): digital implementation investment guide overview / AHRQ: workflow assessment for ambulatory health IT
#Separate evidence from implementation context
The updated CFIR is a framework for examining factors that hinder or support implementation. It distinguishes the innovation being introduced from the strategies used to introduce it. Its authors also put more attention on the people who receive and deliver an innovation.
Ask two different questions: what supports the proposed approach, and what might affect its use in this setting? A clear list of contextual factors is not proof of clinical effectiveness or a safety clearance. The 2022 update drew on literature and user feedback, much of it from US healthcare; it is a thinking framework, not a prediction that a particular project will succeed.
#Make people and responsibilities visible
NHS improvement guidance recommends involving stakeholders while the scope is being defined and revisiting their involvement as the project develops. AHRQ's flowchart method identifies who performs each step and checks the map with people who actually do the work.
An early brief can record the proposed scope, affected roles, unresolved questions and who must check the next decision. Participation in a discussion does not itself establish decision authority. These are general preparation questions; Mynd makes no claim here to provide clinical delivery, project approval or a staffed collaboration service.
Evidence: NHS improvement tools: stakeholder involvement / AHRQ: flowchart method and limits
Source note
The sections above were checked against the linked sources. No clinical review has been performed. This is general research education, not a clinical guideline.